The working relationship and desistance: What constitutes a ‘good quality’ working relationship?

Authors

  • Zoe Cross

Keywords:

desistance, practitioner, children, relationship, youth justice

Abstract

This paper presents findings from a small-scale exploratory piece of research that examined perceptions of what constitutes a ‘good quality’ working relationship between the practitioner and the child, within the criminal justice system. Using a qualitative approach, focus groups and interviews were conducted with practitioners and children, based in two Youth Offending Teams in Wales, United Kingdom. The study sought to explore the characteristics of a ‘good quality’ working relationship, from two different perspectives: (1) the practitioners and (2) the children. Using thematic analysis, findings revealed that whilst both practitioners and children perceived trust to be an important characteristic of a ‘good quality’ working relationship, differences between their perceptions did exist, with practitioners focussing more on the characteristics of reliability and time; and children highlighting the characteristics of genuineness and comfort. It was concluded that such disparity between the way practitioners and children perceive a ‘good quality’ working relationship has important implications for youth justice practice and desistance for children.

Author Biography

  • Zoe Cross

    Zoe Cross, BSc (Hons), PGDip, PGCE, is a Lecturer in Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of South Wales, UK. Zoe is currently a 4th year PhD Criminology student. Current research interests include: desistance, youth offending, the importance of attachment and relationships in offending, the impact of trauma on offending; the psychology of crime.

References

Downloads

Published

2023-02-04

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

The working relationship and desistance: What constitutes a ‘good quality’ working relationship?. (2023). Salus Journal, 8(2), 77-99. https://journals.csu.domains/index.php/salusjournal/article/view/119